Tag: MRO

When the shortage becomes a knowledge problem, not just a headcount one 

When the Shortage Becomes a Knowledge Problem, Not Just a Headcount One

Estimated reading time: 4 minutes

An already widely discussed figure in aviation right now comes from Boeing’s 2025 Pilot and Technician Outlook. Suggesting that 710,000 new maintenance technicians will be needed over the next 20 years just to keep the global commercial fleet flying. 

At IATA’s inaugural World Maintenance and Engineering Symposium in Madrid this June, Stuart Fox, IATA’s Director of Flight and Technical Operations, expanded on this idea. Fox reframed the shortage as something more specific than a recruiting gap and set out a clear path forward for the industry.

IATA called for reviewing recruitment, training, and licensing to cut timelines, expand reach, and improve job stability, with a particular emphasis on growing training capacity, streamlining qualification processes, and building stronger cross-border recognition of skills. 

When we delve into this, inconsistent processes and cross-border skills recognition do not indicate a hiring problem: this is much more of a training and records problem. 

The gap between hired and deployable 

For MROs planning staffing years in advance, the hidden lag between being hired and being fully deployable often determines whether there are enough qualified people available when required, regardless of recruitment numbers.

The industry doesn’t just need more people entering the pipeline; it needs the pipeline itself to move faster and more predictably with emphasis on clear visibility on who is qualified to do what. This is something digital and AI-supported tools can help clarify. 

The same dynamic shows up across safety, compliance, and training teams. When these teams are stretched, the issue isn’t workload but how quickly the organization can make sense of its own data. Much of that pressure traces back to the impacts of the COVID-19 disruption, which thinned out mentoring pipelines and left fewer experienced instructors to pass knowledge on. The warning signs include overdue reviews, recurring findings, and training gaps, but they are rarely brought together in a way that shows the bigger picture. 

Border complexities  

The problem compounds when we layer in the cross-border element. Aviation is a global labour market, but technicians typically train and get licensed under a single regulator’s framework. Regional shortages don’t consider these borders, so for the industry to fill gaps efficiently, a technician’s qualification needs to carry weight when they move to a different operator or MRO in a different country. 

Credentials earned under one regulatory authority usually need extra verification, retraining, or paperwork before they’re accepted elsewhere. IATA identifies this as one of the two biggest levers for closing the technician gap, alongside faster qualification, which depends as much on documentation and verification as on training design. 

For MRO organizations staffing across multiple countries, that friction shows up as a delay. A qualified technician may sit idle while credentials are re-verified, or risk being treated as less qualified simply because the records proving otherwise aren’t structured in a way the receiving organization can easily trust. 

Where this becomes a records problem 

Time-to-competence and cross-border recognition point to the same conclusion: this shortage won’t be solved on the recruiting floor alone. Getting this right is about helping organizations get more value from the technicians they already have. By making training faster and higher quality, whilst ensuring existing skills are recognized wherever needed.  

Meaning that:  

  • Competency needs to be a structured, queryable record and instantly retrievable, rather than reconstructed for an audit.  
  • Qualification data needs to travel with the technician between bases, fleets, and jurisdictions in an immediately usable form.  
  • Training content and task cards need to stay synchronized, so procedural updates do not quietly widen qualification gaps.  

When these connections are manual or scattered across spreadsheets, people spend too much time reconstructing context instead of identifying risks and taking action. 

TrainingManager365 connects qualification tracking, recurrent training, and evaluation management as one system rather than separate tools, giving supervisors real-time visibility into who is authorized for what, regardless of where that authorization was earned. 

The reframe that matters 

Industry conversations are shifting towards how the industry develops, validates, and deploys expertise once people are in the workforce. This means making better use of the skills already available. 

The challenge is not only attracting new talent but also helping technicians reach productivity faster while ensuring their skills are visible, trusted, and easy to verify. AI-supported solutions give MROs a clear, auditable view of qualifications and competencies. This helps demonstrate compliance, deploy technicians with confidence, identify expiring qualifications, and address training needs before they impact operations. 

Rather than replacing training teams, connected platforms support better decision-making. They reduce administrative effort and help specialists apply their judgement more quickly and consistently. 

Success will depend on giving MROs the confidence to deploy the right skills at the right time, wherever they are needed. In doing so, industry can better keep pace with demand in the years ahead.

Older Fleets, Heavier Loads: The Paperwork Problem at the Heart of MRO

Older Fleets, Heavier Loads: The Paperwork Problem at the Heart of MRO

Estimated reading time: 4 minutes

The MRO cycle is usually told as a revenue story. The bigger story is the one hiding in the paperwork. 

The aviation industry ordered the future. Right now, it is flying the past. 

With Airbus and Boeing still unable to clear backlogs, new aircraft are arriving years later than airlines planned. They expect supply chain constraints to limit production until at least 2030, representing more than 6,000 aircraft that would otherwise have been built.  

The knock-on effect is simple: older aircraft are staying in service well beyond their intended retirement, driving the largest maintenance expansion the sector has ever seen. Analysts estimate the MRO market at roughly $96b USD in 2025, which sounds like good news for maintenance teams. More flying hours equal more revenue, right? But there is a quieter problem inside the boom, and it has nothing to do with spanners. It is paperwork. 

The fleet is getting older fast.

The numbers tell a clear story. According to Arthur D. Little’s MRO Super Cycle Viewpoint, the average age of the global fleet has risen from about 13 years before the pandemic to roughly 15 years today, and the share of aircraft parked for more than five years reached a historic high of 4% in 2025. Aircraft that should have retired are instead heading back for heavier checks. 

This is not a short pause. Projections state that widebody aircraft will retire at an average age of 24.4 years by 2034, with narrowbodies pushed out to 21.2 years. For the foreseeable future, managing age is the job.  

Older aircraft do not just need more work. They need more proof. 

Here is the part that rarely makes the headlines. An older airframe carries a heavier compliance load than a younger one doing exactly the same flying. 

Heavier C and D checks. More airworthiness directives to action. Repetitive inspections for fatigue and corrosion. Life-limited parts to track. Back-to-birth records to maintain and prove. Every one of those generates documentation, revisions, signoffs, and evidence. 

And that load does not scale in line with flying hours. It scales faster. A ten-year-old aircraft and a twenty-year-old aircraft can fly the same route on the same day, yet the older one demands materially more in inspections, controlled content and traceable proof. The work is visible on the hangar floor. The paperwork is not, until it goes wrong. 

The real risk: the gap between the revision and the technician.

When documentation volume climbs while the workforce is already stretched thin, the failure point is rarely the task. It is the chain between a revision being issued and the right, current version reaching the technician doing the job. 

A task card updated in engineering, which another department only sees three days later. A repetitive inspection is logged in one system while the qualification to perform it sits in another. A corrective action that closes in one base but not across every shift and vendor. None of these reflect a lack of skill or intent. They reflect fragmentation, and an ageing fleet exposes fragmentation faster than anything else. 

The constraint in this cycle is not hangar capacity. It is whether the right information reaches the right person, at the right moment, with proof that it did. 

Turning the burden into an advantage.

The operators who will thrive treat documentation as the spine of airworthiness, not as overhead to be tolerated. The difference between the two is whether content, training, and safety actions work as one system or as separate silos that an ageing fleet quietly pulls apart. 

This is where the discipline of connected operations earns its keep. When technical actions sit on one platform, a revision reaches the right technician with the right authorisation, corrective actions close across every station, and audit evidence builds itself in the background. The Comply365 Platform is built around exactly that model. The older the fleet, the more that discipline pays back. 

The aircraft may be older. The way you manage them does not have to be.

The MRO cycle will not last forever. As production normalises towards the end of the decade, fleet ages will ease and retirement schedules will return closer to historic norms. But the operators who build disciplined, connected content control now will carry that advantage into the next fleet generation, long after the backlog clears. 

Age is not the enemy. Losing control of the paperwork is. 

A question you should be asking yourself: As your fleet gets older, where does the chain break first for you: getting the right revision to the floor, tracking inspections and life-limited parts, or proving it all at audit?

EASA Part‑IS Explained: What Aviation and MRO Leaders Need to Know About Information Security Compliance 

EASA Part‑IS Explained: What Aviation and MRO Leaders Need to Know About Information Security Compliance

Estimated reading time: 5 minutes

Introduction: Why EASA Part‑IS Matters Now 

The European aviation regulatory landscape has shifted significantly with the introduction of EASA PartIS, established under Regulation (EU) 2022/1645 and further detailed in Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/203

For airlines, MROs, CAMOs, and other approved aviation organizations, Part‑IS mandates an Information Security Management System (ISMS). Its purpose is clear: to ensure that information and information systems are protected wherever their compromise could impact aviation safety, regulatory compliance, or operational continuity

This regulation reflects a simple reality: modern aviation depends on digital information. From maintenance data and controlled documentation to training records and operational systems, information integrity and availability are now safety‑critical. 

Who Is Accountable Under EASA PartIS? 

EASA Part‑IS applies to the organization, not just to IT or cybersecurity teams. As with safety and compliance, ultimate accountability rests with the Accountable Manager

In practice, however, Part‑IS is a shared responsibility across senior leadership. Information security risks cut across operational, maintenance, safety, training, and compliance functions, meaning no single role can manage Part‑IS alone. 

Key contributors typically include the ISMS Manager or CISO, supported by Compliance Monitoring, Safety, Flight Operations, Maintenance, Ground Operations, and Training leadership. In MRO and Part145 environments, this shared ownership is particularly important, as maintenance records, technical documentation, and competency data are all information assets that directly support airworthiness and regulatory compliance. 

Regulators expect to see clear ownership, defined responsibilities, and coordination across these roles, rather than treating Part-IS as a purely technical issue. 

What Does EASA PartIS Regulate? 

A common misunderstanding is that EASA Part‑IS certifies or approves specific software products. It does not. 

Part‑IS regulates how information systems are used within an aviation organization, not what those systems are called. Any system can fall within scope if a loss of confidentiality, integrity, or availability could affect aviation safety or compliance. 

This includes systems supporting: 

  • Flight and ground operations 
  • Maintenance and continuing airworthiness 
  • Safety and risk management 
  • Regulatory compliance and authority oversight 
  • Training, qualifications, and competency management 

The key question is simple: If this system failed or was compromised, could it affect safe operations? If the answer is yes, Part‑IS applies, regardless of whether the organization is an airline or an MRO. 

EASA PartIS Applicability Across Comply365 Solutions 

When deployed within an aviation organization, Comply365 solutions may fall within the organization’s PartIS scope, depending entirely on how they are used. 

It is important to be clear on accountability: 

  • The aviation organization remains fully responsible for compliance 
  • Comply365 acts as a supporting supplier, providing secure platforms, governance controls, and evidence to support oversight

Final determination of Part‑IS compliance always rests with the customer and their competent authority

SafetyManager365 and EASA Part‑IS 

SafetyManager365 supports EASA Part‑IS in two complementary ways

1. InformationSecurity Risk Identification and Management 

Part‑IS requires organizations to identify, assess, and manage information‑security risks that may affect aviation safety. 

SafetyManager365 can be configured to: 

  • Identify and document information‑security risks 
  • Assess severity and potential safety impact 
  • Define and track mitigations and corrective actions 
  • Monitor effectiveness and residual risk over time 

While SafetyManager365 is not a dedicated cybersecurity or GRC tool, it aligns well with EASA guidance by allowing organizations to use existing SMSbased risk management approaches to support Part‑IS. 

2. Platform Security, Resilience, and Governance 

At platform level, Comply365 provides controls that support Part‑IS expectations, including: 

  • Role‑based access control and least‑privilege principles 
  • Protection of data integrity and availability 
  • Incident monitoring and response processes 
  • Backup, disaster recovery, and business continuity capabilities 
  • ISO/IEC 27001‑aligned information‑security governance 

Together, these support the use of SafetyManager365 as a secure and auditable system within a Part‑IS environment. 

ContentManager365 and EASA PartIS 

ContentManager365 typically falls within Part‑IS scope when used to manage or distribute: 

  • Operational manuals (OM, FCOM, MEL) 
  • Maintenance Organization Exposition (MOE) 
  • Safety‑critical and compliance‑driven documentation 

In these use cases, Part‑IS expectations focus on controlled access, content integrity, availability, and traceability. 

ContentManager365 supports these requirements through: 

  • Role‑based permissions and access control 
  • Structured authoring, review, and approval workflows 
  • Full version control and audit trails 
  • Secure hosting aligned with ISO/IEC 27001 

For MROs, this is especially important where documentation integrity underpins continued airworthiness. 

TrainingManager365 and EASA PartIS 

TrainingManager365 may fall within Part‑IS scope when used for: 

  • Safety‑critical training 
  • Regulatory qualification and recurrency records 
  • Evidence used during audits or authority oversight 

In these scenarios, loss of data integrity or availability could indirectly affect aviation safety. 

TrainingManager365 supports Part‑IS through: 

  • Controlled access to training records 
  • Protection of record integrity and traceability 
  • Audit trails for oversight 
  • Secure hosting, backup, and recovery capabilities 

This is particularly relevant for licensed engineers and certifying staff in MRO environments. 

PlatformWide Information Security and Governance 

Across all Comply365 solutions, customers benefit from shared platform controls, including: 

  • ISO/IEC 27001‑aligned information‑security management 
  • Encryption of data in transit and at rest 
  • Secure hosting environments 
  • Incident response and supplier oversight 
  • Contractual assurances via DPAs and security addenda 

Roles, Responsibilities, and Regulatory Accountability 

Under EASA Part‑IS: 

  • Compliance accountability remains with the aviation organization 
  • Comply365 provides supporting systems and controls 
  • Compliance is assessed by the competent authority 
  • Comply365 does not claim Part‑IS certification 

Key Takeaways for Aviation and MRO Leadership 

  • EASA Part‑IS applies at the organizational level 
  • Applicability depends on system usage, not product names 
  • MROs are fully in scope 
  • Comply365 supports governance, security, and evidence needs 
  • Final accountability always remains with the customer 

Connected Compliance: The Competitive Advantage for Modern MRO

Discover how connected compliance helps MROs unify Tech Pubs, Training, and Safety/Quality to deliver real‑time qualification confidence, faster updates, and audit‑ready proof.

Estimated reading time: 5 minutes

For MRO (Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul) organizations, airlines, and other highly regulated operators, the margin between safe operations and systemic vulnerability is narrowing. A recent U.S. DOT Inspector General audit highlighting gaps in FAA oversight may have focused on a major U.S. airline, but the message extends across the entire maintenance and engineering ecosystem: 

When oversight tightens or thins, the burden shifts even more heavily to MRO teams to demonstrate compliance quickly, accurately, and across every touchpoint of the operation. 

This isn’t just about keeping up with regulatory expectations. It’s about proving that the right person performed the right task, using the right content, with the right qualifications, every single time. 

And that reality is reshaping what operational excellence looks like heading into 2026 and beyond. 

The MRO Compliance Challenge: Proof, Not Assumptions

Across the industry, one of the biggest sources of operational risk isn’t a missed step; it’s the breakdown in the chain between: 

Change → Understanding → Execution → Auditable Proof 

These breakdowns are especially visible in MRO environments, where the volume and complexity of work multiply the impact of delays or gaps: 

  • A task card or engineering revision is released… but line stations or hangars don’t see it quickly enough. 
  • A maintenance task is signed off… but qualification or currency wasn’t validated now of work. 
  • A safety finding appears… but corrective actions don’t consistently close across shifts, bases, or third‑party vendors. 

These issues don’t reflect a lack of intent or expertise. They reflect system fragmentation

Many MROs still operate with siloed tools for Technical Publications, Training, and Safety/Quality. Even when integrated, these systems often exchange data in ways never designed for real‑time operational decision‑making. 

That’s the difference between integration and orchestration

Integration Isn’t Enough Anymore

Airlines and MROs have tried to reduce friction by linking systems, exporting training records, syncing status updates, or passing acknowledgements between tools. But integrations alone cannot support the pace, scale, and regulatory scrutiny facing modern maintenance operations. 

Maintenance excellence requires: 

  • real‑time access to the latest procedures 
  • immediate qualification validation 
  • consistent execution across every hangar, line station, and vendor 
  • and audit‑ready proof built directly into the workflow 

True operational transformation happens when all compliance‑critical functions operate on one architecture with one intent. 

That’s where the Comply365 Platform changes what’s possible. 

A Platform Engineered for MRO Connected Compliance

The Comply365 Platform unifies: 

…into a single architecture that supports airworthiness, compliance, and operational consistency. 

The power isn’t simply that “System A talks to System B.” It’s that the entire compliance ecosystem is built to work together, instantly and intelligently. 

This architecture unlocks capabilities that siloed tools cannot deliver: 

1. Intelligent Content → Training → Qualification Workflows Built for MRO

In a maintenance environment, engineering revisions, task card updates, and procedural changes need to move quickly and with total clarity. 

With Comply365, when content changes: 

  • Targeted training is triggered automatically 
  • Acknowledgements are pushed to the right roles 
  • Qualifications and currency update in real time 
  • Leadership gains immediate visibility into who is ready to perform which tasks 

This removes the traditional lag between engineering teams issuing updates and technicians becoming fully competent to execute. 

2. Assignment Based on Authorization, Not Availability

In MRO operations, assigning work isn’t just about who’s on shift; it’s about whether the technician: 

  • is fully qualified
  • is current
  • has seen the latest revision
  • and is authorized at the moment of task execution

Because Training, Qualifications, and Manuals sit in one platform, Comply365 provides real‑time, task‑level validation. This reduces rework, improves safety margins, and ensures the right people complete the right tasks, especially critical in heavy checks, AOG events, and vendor oversight. 

3. Audit‑Ready Evidence; Automatically Created

Whether preparing for FAA, EASA, IOSA, customer, or internal audits, MROs face some of the most demanding evidence requirements in the industry. 

Comply365 automatically captures: 

  • Who accessed which manual
  • When a revision was acknowledged
  • Which technicians performed which tasks
  • their qualification state at that exact moment, and how corrective actions were completed. 

Instead of assembling data from multiple systems under pressure, evidence is generated as a byproduct of everyday workflows

If an audit arrived tomorrow, could you produce a complete, traceable compliance chain across every hangar, station, and vendor? 

With Comply365, you can effortlessly. 

AI‑Powered Efficiency

Each Comply365 solution is enhanced with AI capabilities that improve speed, accuracy, and decision‑making. These tools aren’t add‑ons; they’re embedded into workflows. 

Examples include: 

  • AI‑assisted content updates that help rewrite, summarize, or validate procedures (CoAuthor). 
  • AI‑driven analysis in Safety & Quality (CoAnalyst) to detect trends and support smarter investigations. 
  • AI‑powered recommendations that support qualification management and change impact assessments (CoTrainer

For MROs, these tools reduce administrative load, shorten revision cycles, and improve decision‑making across engineering, training, and QA. 

This leads to: 

  • faster updates 
  • fewer manual checks 
  • reduced rework 
  • stronger safety outcomes 
  • and meaningful cost savings 

Organizations don’t just move faster; they move with greater consistency and less risk

The Future of Operational Excellence = Connected Compliance

Industry regulators are shifting toward more data‑driven oversight, while MRO operations continue to expand in complexity, demand, and customer expectations. 

Organizations running disconnected systems simply can’t keep pace. 

But those who unify their Training, Safety/Quality, and Technical Publications into one orchestrated platform gain: 

  • clearer compliance visibility 
  • AI‑powered efficiencies 
  • real‑time qualification confidence 
  • reduced operational risk 
  • consistent execution across all locations 
  • and effortless audit readiness 

Comply365 isn’t just a system; it’s a more resilient operational model built for the modern MRO environment. 

Because when oversight thins, connected compliance becomes your strongest competitive advantage.